Title
Nadjib Tannus Hashim vs. Concepcion
Case
G.R. No. 18381
Decision Date
Jan 12, 1922
A husband's refusal to financially support his wife resulted in a court-ordered maintenance pendente lite, leading to his contempt charge and arrest, with the Supreme Court affirming the jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance in spousal maintenance cases.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 18381)

Facts:

  • The case involves Nadjib Tannus Hashim (petitioner) and Honorable Pedro Concepcion (respondent judge) along with Afife Abdo Cheyban Gorayeb (respondent).
  • On November 11, 1920, Gorayeb filed a complaint against Hashim in the Court of First Instance of Manila.
  • Gorayeb alleged that Hashim owned property worth P1,000,000 and earned P4,000 monthly but refused to provide financial support.
  • She sought an order for Hashim to pay her P1,000 monthly for maintenance.
  • On November 28, 1920, the court ordered Hashim to pay the specified amount as maintenance pendente lite.
  • Hashim failed to comply, leading to a writ of execution being issued.
  • Supplementary proceedings were initiated, and Hashim's responses during examination were evasive.
  • An alias writ of execution was issued for maintenance payments covering specific periods, resulting in the sale of Hashim's property interests.
  • Gorayeb's attorneys filed contempt charges against Hashim for non-compliance, leading to a contempt ruling by Judge Concepcion on November 28, 1921.
  • Hashim evaded arrest, prompting his attorneys to file a petition claiming the judge exceeded his jurisdiction.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court of First Instance had jurisdiction to issue the order for maintenance pendente lite.
  • The contempt order against Hashim was warranted due to his conduct.
  • The responden...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed that the Court of First Instance had jurisdiction over maintenance actions by a wife against her husband, referencing Yangco vs....continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.