Title
Marcelo vs. Maniquis
Case
G.R. No. 8703
Decision Date
Oct 26, 1916
The ownership of the disputed land in Santa Rosa, Nueva Ecija is awarded to the defendants due to their proven possession and recorded title, as the plaintiff did not establish ownership or possession.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 8703)

Facts:

  • The case involves a land dispute in Tangos, barrio of Soledad, Santa Rosa, Nueva Ecija.
  • Plaintiff Nazario Marcelo filed a complaint on August 15, 1911, claiming exclusive ownership of a 212-cavane parcel of land.
  • Marcelo alleged that defendants Clemencia Maniquis and Juan de la Cruz unlawfully appropriated part of his land on July 11, 1911, causing him damages.
  • He sought a preliminary injunction, a declaration of ownership, and P 200 in damages.
  • The defendants denied the allegations, asserting that Clemencia and her late husband had possessed the land for over thirty years based on a sale from Potenciano Marcelo, Nazario's nephew.
  • The trial court ruled in favor of Marcelo on April 30, 1912, ordering the return of the land and payment of damages.
  • The defendants appealed the decision.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court reversed the trial court's judgment, absolving the defendants from the complaint.
  • The court concluded that Nazario Marce...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that ownership must be established through positive rights, not mere allegations.
  • Marcelo failed to demonstrate ownership and the identity of the land he claimed.
  • Evidence indicated that the land Marcelo referred to did not match the boundaries of the land held by the defendants.
  • Marcelo's lack of objection during the possessory information proceedings initiated...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.