Case Digest (G.R. No. 170233)
Facts:
- Josephine Lucio Manalo filed an administrative complaint against Hon. Clarito Demaala, a Municipal Judge in Aborlan, Palawan, on January 8, 1981.
- The complaint was based on Demaala's alleged failure to pay a debt of P10,000 stemming from a transaction in December 1972.
- Manalo sold a Toyota Mini bus to Demaala for P12,000, with a downpayment of P2,000 and ten monthly installments of P1,000 starting April 30, 1973.
- After the downpayment, Demaala did not make further payments despite multiple demands from Manalo.
- Demaala sold the vehicle to a third party and claimed it had defects, specifically defective piston rings, making it unusable for public transport.
- He argued that a verbal agreement existed with Manalo, stating he would only continue payments if the vehicle was in good condition.
- Manalo contested this claim, asserting that Demaala, being knowledgeable in law, should have formalized any conditions in writing.
- The case was investigated by Executive Judge Eufrocinio S. dela Merced, who found the sale and payment terms undisputed and ruled that Demaala's claims did not absolve him of his payment obligation.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- Yes, Judge Clarito Demaala willfully failed to pay his just debts to Josephine Lucio Manalo.
- Yes, the failure to pay a just debt is a valid ground for disciplinary a...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court determined that Demaala's acknowledgment of his debt and his inaction in settling it constituted willful neglect of his obligations.
- Under Section 36(b) of Presidential Decree No. 807, willful failure to pay just debts is grounds for disciplinary action.
- Demaala's prolonged inaction reflected poorly on his character as a public official.
- Judges are expected to demonstrate integ...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 170233)
Facts:
This case involves an administrative complaint filed by Josephine Lucio Manalo against Hon. Clarito Demaala, a Municipal Judge in Aborlan, Palawan. The complaint was initiated on January 8, 1981, concerning Judge Demaala's alleged failure to fulfill a contractual obligation amounting to P10,000. The dispute arose from a transaction in December 1972, where Manalo sold a Toyota Mini bus to Demaala for P12,000. The terms of the sale included a downpayment of P2,000, followed by ten monthly installments of P1,000 each, starting on April 30, 1973. After making the initial downpayment, Demaala failed to make any further payments despite repeated demands from Manalo. It was later discovered that Demaala sold the vehicle to a third party.
In his defense, Demaala acknowledged the sale and the agreed payment terms but claimed that the vehicle had defects, specifically defective piston rings, which rendered it unusable for public transport. He asserted that he had incurred additional expenses to repair the vehicle and that a verbal agreement existed between him and Manalo, stipulating that he would only continue payments if the vehicle was in good running condition. This claim was contested by Manalo, who argued that Demaala, being a knowledgeable person in law, should have formalized any such condition in writing.
The case was referred to Executive Judge Eufrocinio S. dela Merced of the Court of First Instance o...