Case Digest (G. R. No. 37110)
Facts:
- Plaintiffs and Appellees: Catalino Mallari, et al.
- Defendant and Appellant: Rural de Abayat.
- Initial Hearing: Court of First Instance of Pampanga.
- Date of Lower Court Order: December 22, 1931.
- Appeal: Defendant appealed the lower court's order.
- Higher Court Review: Case brought before a higher court.
- Decision Date: May 24, 1934.
- Outcome: Higher court affirmed the lower court's decision.
- Specific Nature of the Dispute: Not detailed in the provided text.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The higher court affirmed the decision of the Court of First Instance of Pampanga dated December 22, 1931.
- The appellant, Rural de Aba...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court reviewed the records and considered the arguments from both parties.
- Found no error in the decision of the Court of First Instance of Pampanga.
- Affirmation indicates agreement with the lower court's findings and conclusions.
- Legal basis for the decision not explicitly stated, but ...continue reading
Case Digest (G. R. No. 37110)
Facts:
The case G.R. No. 37110 involves Catalino Mallari and others as plaintiffs and appellees against Rural de Abayat, the defendant and appellant. The events leading to this case unfolded in Pampanga, where the plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendant. The dispute arose from a financial obligation that the defendant allegedly failed to fulfill. The Court of First Instance of Pampanga rendered a decision on December 22, 1931, which favored the plaintiffs, leading to the defendant's appeal. The case was subsequently submitted for decision, and the court, having acquired jurisdiction, reviewed the records and arguments presented by both parties. On May 24, 1934, the court issued its decision affirming the lower court's ruling, thereby upholding the plaintiffs' claims and ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiffs the amount of P40.00 as costs.
Issue:
- Did...