Case Digest (G.R. No. 4001)
Facts:
- Silvestra Lubrico filed a case against Leona Arbado on June 30, 1906, for the recovery of possession of 18 hectares of land.
- Lubrico claimed that the land belonged to her deceased father, Guillermo Lubrico, and that she was the sole general heir.
- Lubrico alleged that Arbado had unlawfully appropriated a portion of the land and had been collecting the fruits from it for three years without Lubrico's permission.
- Arbado denied the allegations and claimed that she was the owner of the land, having possessed it for over forty-three years, including the time her ancestor was in possession.
- Arbado argued that Lubrico had no right to claim ownership over the land.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The court ruled in favor of Silvestra Lubrico, ordering Leona Arbado to return the unlaw...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- In order for an action for the recovery of possession to be maintained, the property claimed must be identified, and the ownership of the plaintiff must be proven.
- Lubrico was able to establish her ownership through documentary evidence, including a title deed issued in favor of her father.
- Arbado failed to provide any evidence of her ownership or the manner in which her ancestor acquired the land.
- Arbado's possession of the land for over forty-three years did not give her a better right of ownership once it was shown that her possession was unlawful and to the prejudice of the true owner.
- Lubrico, as the proven owner, had the right to recover the land from Arbado.
- Arbado, being...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 4001)
Facts:
Silvestra Lubrico filed a case against Leona Arbado for the recovery of possession of a parcel of land. Lubrico claimed that the land belonged to her deceased father and that Arbado had unlawfully appropriated and collected fruits from the land for three years without Lubrico's permission. Lubrico presented documentary evidence to prove her ownership of the land, while Arbado denied the allegations and claimed to have possessed the land as the owner for more than forty-three years.
Issue:
The main issue in this case is whether Arbado's possession of the land is lawful and whether Lubrico has proven her ownership of the land through documentar...