Title
Lim vs. Aromin
Case
A.M. No. P-09-2677
Decision Date
Mar 9, 2011
A court employee was fined and warned for interfering with the execution of a valid sheriff's sale.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.M. No. P-09-2677)

Facts:

  • Complainants: Angelina C. Lim and Vivian M. Gaduang.
  • Respondent: Maribeth G. Aromin, Records Officer I at the MTC in Meycauayan, Bulacan.
  • Complaint filed on January 18, 2007, alleging violations of R.A. 6713 (Code of Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees).
  • Events occurred on November 8, 2006, during the execution of a court order at Holland Industries' warehouse.
  • Complainants had a Decision (June 30, 2005), an Alias Writ of Execution (September 7, 2006), an Order (October 16, 2006), and a Certificate of Sheriff’s Sale.
  • Aromin intervened, claiming an order would be brought to halt the execution.
  • Complainants waited for an hour but continued loading items when no order arrived.
  • Aromin allegedly shouted derogatory remarks and questioned the legality of their actions.
  • Aromin claimed she was called by the warehouse owner to stop the loading, alleging the complainants were forcibly entering the premises.
  • The OCA directed Aromin to comment on the complaint, leading to an investigation by the Executive Judge of the Regional Trial Court.
  • Investigation revealed conflicting accounts but found Aromin guilty of improper conduct.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court found Aromin guilty of violating Section 1, Canon IV of the Code of Conduct for Court Personnel.
  • She was fined P5,000.00 and warned...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Court personnel must prioritize public service and uphold high standards of professionalism.
  • Aromin's actions were inappropriate as she interfered with a legal ex...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.