Title
Levy vs. Johnson
Case
G.R. No. 1876
Decision Date
Aug 12, 1905
A case involving the sale of "The Alhambra" property in Manila, where the court ruled in favor of the defendants, affirming that the buyer acquired a valid interest in the property and there was no evidence of fraud on the part of the sellers.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 1876)

Facts:

  • The case involves the sale of "The Alhambra" property in Manila.
  • Prior to October 21, 1898, Thomas E. Evans and Walter Jackson were the owners of the establishment.
  • Evans attempted to secure a loan from Paul Blum and agreed to buy out Jackson's interest in the property.
  • On October 21, 1898, Evans conveyed an undivided half of the property to Whaley for $1.
  • On the same day, Evans and Whaley executed a bill of sale of the entire property to Paul Blum for 32,443.35 pesos.
  • They also executed an agreement stating that the Alhambra had been mortgaged to Blum and that Evans and Whaley would be equal partners in the business.
  • Blum advanced the full amount of the loan in cash.
  • The business continued under this agreement until December 4, 1899, when Henry Blum notified Evans and Whaley that the amount due on the mortgage was 28,927.97 pesos.
  • On January 4, 1900, Paul Blum took possession of the establishment and Whaley surrendered the property to him in satisfaction of the debt.
  • On January 26, 1900, four documents were executed and delivered, including a deed of the entire property from Paul Blum to Whaley, a deed of an undivided half of the property from Whaley to Johnson, a mortgage by Whaley to Paul Blum, and a contract of partnership between Whaley and Johnson.
  • Johnson paid 15,000 pesos to Whaley for the undivided half of the property, which was the money of Samuel J. Levy.
  • Whaley and Johnson took possession of the property and continued to manage it until July 1901 when it was closed due to a law prohibiting the sale of liquor on the Escolta.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court ruled in favor of the defendants, Paul Blum and Henry Blum, and affirmed the judgment of the Court of First Instance.
  • The court held that Johnson acquired a valid interest in the property through his deed from Whaley.
  • There was no evidence of fraud on the part of the Blums.
  • The case...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • John...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.