Case Digest (A.C. No. 5916)
Facts:
- Complainant Selwyn F. Lao filed an administrative complaint against Atty. Robert W. Medel.
- The complaint cited dishonesty, grave misconduct, and conduct unbecoming of an attorney.
- Medel refused to honor four RCBC checks totaling PHP 22,000, issued as payment for a loan from Lao.
- Despite multiple promises to settle his debt, Medel failed to do so.
- The case was initially filed with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines-Commission on Bar Discipline (IBP-CBD).
- During proceedings, Medel acknowledged his debt and committed to pay PHP 42,000 (including attorney's fees), but failed to comply.
- Medel's conduct during hearings, including abruptly leaving a scheduled hearing, showed disregard for the proceedings and his obligations.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The issuance of worthless checks and failure to pay debts constitute gross misconduct warranting disciplinary action against a lawyer.
- A lawyer can be disciplined for misconduct in their private capacity if it shows them...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court held that deliberately failing to pay just debts and issuing worthless checks constitute gross misconduct.
- Membership in the legal profession demands a high degree of good moral character, both for admission and as a continuing requirement.
- Medel's failure to honor financial commitments and disrespectful behavior during IBP-CBD hearings fell short of the standards expected of a lawyer.
- Lawyers must maintain legal proficiency and a high sta...continue reading
Case Digest (A.C. No. 5916)
Facts:
In the case of "Lao v. Medel," the complainant, Selwyn F. Lao, filed an administrative complaint against Atty. Robert W. Medel for dishonesty, grave misconduct, and conduct unbecoming of an attorney. The complaint stemmed from Medel's persistent refusal to honor four RCBC checks totaling PHP 22,000, which were issued as payment for a loan from Lao. Despite multiple written promises to settle his debt, Medel failed to fulfill his obligations. The case was initially filed with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines-Commission on Bar Discipline (IBP-CBD). During the proceedings, Medel acknowledged his debt and committed to pay a total of PHP 42,000 (including attorney's fees), but he failed to comply with this commitment. Medel's behavior during the hearings, including his abrupt departure from a scheduled hearing, further demonstrated his disregard for the proceedings and his obligations.
Issue:
- Does the issuance of worthless checks and failure to pay debts constitute gross misconduct warranting disciplinary action against a lawyer?
- Can a lawyer be discipline...