Title
Kayaban, Jr. vs. Palicte III
Case
A.C. No. 10815
Decision Date
Oct 5, 2021
A lawyer is suspended for two years for improperly using another lawyer's name and identity, reflecting a breach of professional integrity.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.C. No. 10815)

Facts:

  • A disbarment complaint was filed by Atty. Vicente Roy L. Kayaban, Jr. against Atty. Leonardo B. Palicte III on June 26, 2015.
  • The complaint alleged misrepresentation and unauthorized use of the complainant's name in Civil Case No. 82422, pending in the MeTC, Branch 63, Makati City.
  • The complainant received an Order on February 12, 2014, questioning his absence from a scheduled hearing.
  • Confused, the complainant submitted an Ex-Parte Manifestation, stating he was unaware of the case and that Atty. Palicte had used his name without consent.
  • The complainant requested that all future communications be directed to Atty. Palicte.
  • Investigation revealed the complainant had previously entered his appearance in the case as part of "Kayaban Palicte & Associates."
  • The complainant demanded Atty. Palicte disassociate him from the case, claiming forgery of his signature on the Entry of Appearance.
  • Atty. Palicte acknowledged the demand but the complainant found this response inadequate.
  • The complainant cited violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility regarding dishonesty and misrepresentation.
  • Atty. Palicte claimed an informal partnership with the complainant and denied the allegations, asserting they were unfounded.
  • The IBP investigated and found Atty. Palicte guilty of violating several canons of the Code of Professional Responsibility, recommending suspension instead of disbarment.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court found Atty. Leonardo B. Palicte III guilty of violating the Lawyer's Oath and several canons of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
  • The Court adopted the IBP's recommendat...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court emphasized the expectation for lawyers to maintain the highest standards of honesty, integrity, and fair dealing.
  • Atty. Palicte's actions represented a serious breach of these standards through unauthorized misrepresentation of the complainant's involvement in the case.
  • Sufficient evidence of misrepresentation and dishonesty was fo...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.