Title
Joaquin y Arquillo vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 244570
Decision Date
Feb 17, 2021
A man is convicted of acts of lasciviousness against a minor due to credible prosecution testimonies and evidence.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 244570)

Facts:

  • Ernesto Joaquin y Arquillo (petitioner) was accused of child abuse against a nine-year-old girl, referred to as AAA, on March 22, 2014, in Sta. Maria, Bulacan.
  • The Information filed on April 7, 2014, charged Joaquin with violating Section 10(a) of Republic Act No. 7610, concerning the Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation, and Discrimination Act.
  • Allegations included that Joaquin unlawfully kissed and licked AAA's breast, harming her normal growth and development.
  • Joaquin was arraigned on May 13, 2014, and pleaded not guilty.
  • During pre-trial, the parties agreed on several matters, including the RTC's jurisdiction and Joaquin's identity.
  • The prosecution presented AAA, who had difficulty communicating due to meningitis and epilepsy, and her brother BBB as witnesses.
  • AAA testified through gestures, confirming Joaquin's actions, while BBB corroborated her account, stating he witnessed the incident from outside Joaquin's van.
  • The RTC of Malolos City, Bulacan, found Joaquin guilty on February 24, 2017, sentencing him to imprisonment and ordering him to pay moral damages to AAA.
  • Joaquin appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), which affirmed the RTC's decision but modified the penalty and damages awarded.
  • Joaquin then filed a petition for review on certiorari before the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court denied Joaquin's petition, affirming the CA's decision with modifications.
  • Joaquin was found guilty of acts of lasciviousness under Article 336 of the Revised Penal Code in relation to Section 5(b) of R.A. 7610.
  • He was sentenced to an indeterminate prison term of twelve years and one day as minimum to fifteen years, six months, and twenty days...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court determined that the elements of Section 10(a) of R.A. 7610 were adequately alleged in the Information, indicating Joaquin's actions were prejudicial to AAA's growth and development.
  • The Court clarified that the acts attributed to Joaquin constituted sexual abuse, specifically penalized under Section 5(b) of R.A. 7610 and Article 336 of the Revised Penal Code.
  • ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.