Title
Javier vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. L-22248
Decision Date
Jan 30, 1965
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Commission on Elections and respondent Lomugdang, declaring the proclamation of petitioner Javier as mayor-elect null and void due to violation of the lawful order of the Commission, and affirming the Commission's authority to suspend the board of canvassers and appoint substitutes even after proclamation has been made.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-22248)

Facts:

  • In the November 12, 1963 elections, Paterno Javier and Felix Lomugdang were candidates for the municipal mayor of Culasi, Antique.
  • During the canvassing, it was found that in Precinct No. 4, Lomugdang was credited with only 23 votes in the election return, while the tally board showed he had 83 votes.
  • The Board of Inspectors of Precinct No. 4 recognized this as a clerical error and filed a verified petition with the Municipal Board of Canvassers to correct the election return.
  • Atty. Tomas del Castillo, the COMELEC representative in Culasi, instructed the Board of Canvassers to suspend the canvassing of the election return for Precinct No. 4.
  • Despite this directive, the Board of Canvassers proceeded and proclaimed Javier as the elected mayor.
  • Lomugdang filed a petition for a judicial recount in the Court of First Instance of Antique, which was dismissed following Javier's proclamation.
  • On November 26, 1963, COMELEC annulled Javier's proclamation, suspended the Board of Canvassers, and authorized Atty. Del Castillo to appoint substitutes for a new canvass.
  • Javier filed a petition with the Supreme Court, claiming COMELEC overstepped its jurisdiction and that the Board of Canvassers was functus officio after the proclamation.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  1. Yes, the Supreme Court ruled that COMELEC had the authority to annul Javier's proclamation and suspend the Board of Canvassers.
  2. Yes, the defiance of the COMELEC representative's directive was a valid cause for the removal and substitution of the Board of Canvassers.
  3. No, the dismissal of Lomugda...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court held that the COMELEC representative's directive to suspend the canvassing and proclamation was valid due to the clear clerical error in Precinct No. 4's election return.
  • The Board of Canvassers' continuation of the canvass and proclamation of Javier, in violation of this directive, rendered the proclamation null and void.
  • The Court emphasized th...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.