Title
Itogon-Suyoc Mines, Inc. vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. L-54280
Decision Date
Sep 30, 1982
The National Labor Relations Commission awarded separation pay to an employee dismissed for theft, citing his long service and insufficient evidence of company oppression.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-54280)

Facts:

  • Itogon-Suyoc Mines, Inc. (petitioner) filed for clearance to terminate Opeginio Abreu, Sr. (respondent) on December 22, 1978, citing "highgrading" (theft of high-grade stones).
  • Abreu was placed under preventive suspension pending the termination application.
  • Abreu opposed the termination, leading to compulsory arbitration at the NLRC in Baguio City.
  • On April 2, 1979, the Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of Abreu, finding insufficient evidence for the highgrading charge.
  • The Labor Arbiter denied the termination application and ordered Abreu's reinstatement with back wages and seniority rights.
  • Itogon-Suyoc Mines appealed, and on May 23, 1980, the NLRC reversed the Labor Arbiter's decision, finding Abreu guilty of breach of trust.
  • The NLRC ordered the petitioner to pay Abreu separation pay equivalent to fifteen days' pay for each year of service, citing "grounds of equity."
  • Dissatisfied, Itogon-Suyoc Mines filed a petition for certiorari, arguing the NLRC's ruling was contrary to law and constituted grave abuse of discretion.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court denied the application for clearance to terminate Abreu's services.
  • It ordered Itogon-Suyoc Mines, Inc. to reinstate Abreu to his former or a substantially equivalent position without loss of seniority rights, but ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court deferred to the NLRC's findings regarding Abreu's breach of trust, as he did not contest the NLRC's decision.
  • It emphasized that termination for just cause, such as breach of trust, does not require the employer to pay separation pay, as this contradicts the nature of just cause dismissals.
  • Article 283 of the Labor Code states that termination for just cause does not entitle the...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.