Title
International Freeport Traders, Inc. vs. Danzas Intercontinental, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 181833
Decision Date
Jan 26, 2011
International Freeport Traders, Inc. is liable for electric charges, demurrage, and storage fees due to their failure to provide required documents, causing shipment delays for Toblerone chocolates.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 181833)

Facts:

  • International Freeport Traders, Inc. (IFTI) is the petitioner; Danzas Intercontinental, Inc. (Danzas) is the respondent.
  • In March 1997, IFTI ordered Toblerone chocolates and assorted confectioneries from Jacobs Suchard Tobler Ltd. in Switzerland via Colombo Merchants Phils., Inc.
  • The delivery term was "F.O.B. Ex-Works."
  • Jacobs engaged Danmar Lines of Switzerland for shipping, which issued negotiable house bills of lading signed by Danzas.
  • The bills listed Jacobs as the shipper, China Banking Corporation as the consignee, and IFTI to be notified.
  • Goods were to be delivered at the Clark Special Economic Zone, with Manila as the port of discharge, covered by Letters of Credit under a "freight collect" arrangement.
  • Danmar contracted Orient Overseas Container Line (OOCL) for transport, which issued a non-negotiable master bill of lading stating prepaid freight with Danzas as the consignee.
  • Danmar paid OOCL an arbitrary fee of US$425.00 for processing the release of the goods, which arrived on May 14, 1997.
  • Danzas informed IFTI of the shipment's arrival; IFTI prepared the import permit.
  • Danzas required IFTI to surrender original bills of lading and provide a bank guarantee, which IFTI initially refused.
  • After negotiations, IFTI applied for a bank guarantee, approved on May 23, 1997, and secured by Danzas on June 6, 1997.
  • Danzas delivered the goods on June 16, 1997, but later demanded payment of P181,809.45 for services.
  • IFTI ignored the demand, prompting Danzas to file a complaint in the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) of Parañaque City.
  • The MeTC ruled in favor of Danzas; IFTI appealed, leading to a reversal by the Court of Appeals, which found a contract of lease of service existed between IFTI and Danzas.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court ruled that a contract of lease of service exists between IFTI and Danzas.
  • IFTI is liable to Danzas for costs associated with the delay in the release of ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court identified multiple contracts in the transaction: between IFTI and Jacobs, Jacobs and Danmar, and Danmar and OOCL.
  • Danzas acted as an agent for Danmar, responsible for delivering goods to IFTI.
  • IFTI's actions, such as agreeing to provide a bank guarantee and requesting Danzas to pick up the import p...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.