Title
Industrial Timber Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 111985
Decision Date
Jun 30, 1994
The judgment was modified due to the bank's permanent closure, making reinstatement impractical, and emphasized proper procedures for filing pleadings.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 111985)

Facts:

  • The case involves Industrial Timber Corporation and Lorenzo Tangsoc as petitioners against the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), Concordia Dos Pueblos, and Lolita Sanchez as respondents.
  • The private respondents were illegally dismissed on April 26, 1986.
  • They filed a complaint, which Labor Arbiter Amado M. Solamo decided on February 26, 1987.
  • The Labor Arbiter ordered reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and awarded back wages totaling P24,300 each, along with P10,000 each for moral and exemplary damages and 10% of the total award for attorney's fees.
  • The NLRC affirmed this decision on February 3, 1992, and directed payment of severance benefits if reinstatement was not possible.
  • The resolution became final and executory on March 9, 1992.
  • On March 20, 1992, the private respondents filed an ex parte motion for a writ of execution, claiming non-reinstatement and entitlement to back salaries.
  • A computation by Fiscal Examiner Renrico N. Pacamo indicated each respondent was entitled to P175,964.84, covering three years of back wages and benefits.
  • Labor Arbiter Leon P. Murillo concurred with the computation, and the NLRC modified the award to P375,795.20.
  • The petitioners' motion for reconsideration was denied due to tardiness, leading them to appeal to the Supreme Court, alleging grave abuse of discretion by the NLRC.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the NLRC did not err in modifying the monetary award, as the modification was justified by subsequent circumstances.
  • The Court affirmed the NLRC's denial of the petitioners'...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court noted that while a final and executory judgment typically cannot be modified, exceptions exist when supervening events make execution impossible or unjust.
  • The time elapsed since the original decision requ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.