Title
IN RE: Yu Tong vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-9843
Decision Date
Apr 23, 1957
Manuel Yu Tong Su is granted Philippine citizenship as the court finds witness testimony sufficient to establish his good moral character, overcoming opposition from the Republic.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-9843)

Facts:

  • Manuel Yu Tong, also known as Kuang Tze Young, filed a petition for naturalization in the Philippines.
  • The petition was submitted to the Court of First Instance of Cebu and was granted on April 23, 1957.
  • The trial court found that Yu Tong met all legal qualifications for naturalization.
  • The Republic of the Philippines, represented by the Solicitor General, opposed the petition.
  • The opposition argued that witness Ricardo Dorotheo was incompetent to testify about Yu Tong's character and conduct.
  • Dorotheo claimed to have known Yu Tong since 1935 or 1936 as a classmate of his son at San Carlos College.
  • Dorotheo testified that he observed Yu Tong's conduct and believed him to be law-abiding and a potential positive contributor to the country.
  • The Solicitor General contended that Dorotheo's limited interactions did not provide sufficient knowledge of Yu Tong's reputation in the community.
  • The government appealed the trial court's decision based on the alleged disqualification of the witness.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Cebu, granting Manuel Yu Tong's petition for naturalization.
  • The Court ruled that Ricardo Dorotheo's t...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court reasoned that a witness's qualifications to testify about a person's character do not solely depend on the frequency of their interactions.
  • Dorotheo's testimony, indicating years of acquaintance and observation of Yu Tong's conduct, was deemed adequate.
  • The Court emphasized that a person's reputation often derives from the opinions of others rather than direct...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.