Title
IN RE: Yu Ti vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-19913
Decision Date
Jun 23, 1965
The petition for Philippine citizenship is denied due to non-compliance with education requirements, absence of a certificate of arrival, incomplete disclosure of residences, and inadequate financial capacity.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-19913)

Facts:

  • Yu Ti, also known as Vicente Yute or Kanga, was born on October 9, 1907, in Amoy, China.
  • He arrived in the Philippines in September 1920 aboard the S.S. "Thay Sing."
  • Initially resided in Manila for two years, then moved to Cortez, Bohol, for eleven years.
  • In 1933, he relocated to Ozamiz City, where he has lived since.
  • On August 30, 1960, Yu Ti applied for Philippine citizenship in the Court of First Instance of Misamis Occidental.
  • The Republic of the Philippines, represented by the City Fiscal of Ozamiz City, filed a motion to dismiss the petition on August 25, 1961.
  • Yu Ti responded to the motion on September 7, 1961, and the court denied the motion to dismiss.
  • After trial, on March 28, 1962, the court ruled in favor of Yu Ti, granting him naturalization.
  • The Republic appealed, arguing Yu Ti did not file a declaration of intention and failed to meet other requirements under the Revised Naturalization Law.
  • Yu Ti was married to Tan Bee, residing in Hong Kong, and had two children living in Amoy, China.
  • The Republic contended Yu Ti did not provide education to his children in recognized schools and failed to present his certificate of arrival.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision, denying Yu Ti's petition for naturalization.
  • The court found that Yu Ti did not meet the necessary requirements for citizenship, including the declaration of intention, education of his children, prese...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that under Section 6 of the Revised Naturalization Law, an applicant must file a declaration of intention unless they have resided continuously in the Philippines for at least 30 years and have provided education to all their children in recognized schools.
  • The requirement applies to all children, regardless of their age at the time of the petition.
  • Yu Ti's failure to pre...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.