Title
IN RE: Tan Sen vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-23181
Decision Date
Oct 24, 1967
The Supreme Court rejects Tan Sen's citizenship petition for lack of proof of publication compliance, doubts about income authenticity, and unauthorized alias usage.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-23181)

Facts:

  • The petitioner-appellee, Tan Sen (also known as Cayetano Tan, Cayetano Tan Pao Ho, and Tan Pao Hu), sought naturalization as a Philippine citizen.
  • The Republic of the Philippines, represented by the Solicitor General, appealed the decision of the Court of First Instance of Misamis Occidental, which had granted Tan's petition.
  • Tan was born on February 5, 1919, in Lamua, Amoy, China, and arrived in the Philippines on August 1, 1931, aboard the vessel "Ang Kin."
  • He had not left the country since his arrival and filed his petition on August 9, 1961.
  • Tan was married to Sy Sen, also a Chinese citizen, and they had three children: Lilia, Betty, and Wayne.
  • The family resided in Sinacaban, Misamis Occidental, where Tan engaged in copra trading, claiming an average annual net income exceeding P4,000.
  • During the hearing, he demonstrated proficiency in English and the Visayan dialect.
  • Two witnesses testified to his good moral character.
  • The Solicitor General raised objections regarding notice and publication requirements, legitimacy of income, and Tan's use of aliases without judicial authority.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision, denying Tan Sen's petition for naturalization.
  • The Court found that the notice and publication requirements were not met.
  • The reported income of the petitioner was deemed questionabl...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the legal requirement for publication of a naturalization petition in a newspaper of general circulation within the applicant's province.
  • The evidence, particularly the affidavit from the publisher of "Nueva Era," was insufficient to prove the newspaper's circulation in Misamis Occidental.
  • The Court noted that positive evidence is necessary to establish compliance with ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.