Title
IN RE: Santia
Case
A.M. No. 85-1-6874-RTC
Decision Date
Apr 25, 1985
A stenographic reporter is terminated and barred from government service for prolonged absence, abandonment of duties, document falsification, and malfeasance.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.M. No. 85-1-6874-RTC)

Facts:

  • Milagros Santia was a stenographic reporter for Branch XXX of the Regional Trial Court in Iloilo City.
  • She was absent from work without approved leave since January 1, 1984, after her leave expired on December 29, 1983.
  • On March 28, 1984, Acting Court Administrator Arturo Buena directed Santia to explain her absence, warning of potential administrative action.
  • Santia failed to respond or return to work.
  • On October 10, 1984, Acting Executive Judge Amelia K. del Rosario informed the Chief Justice about Santia's ongoing absence and its negative impact on court operations.
  • Judge del Rosario accused Santia of falsifying her signature on a special power of attorney, allowing her to collect paychecks for judges and court employees.
  • This forgery led to the endorsement of 16 checks, and criminal charges were filed against her.
  • On October 29, 1984, Santia was convicted of seventeen counts of falsification of private documents, receiving an indeterminate sentence and a fine.
  • Acting Court Administrator Buena recommended her separation from service as a notoriously undesirable employee under Section 40(d) of P.D. 827.
  • The court decided to separate Santia from her position due to abandonment and malfeasance, forfeiting her retirement benefits and barring her from future government employment.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • Yes, Milagros Santia should be administratively penalized for her prolonged absence without leave.
  • Yes, the act of falsifying a signature constitutes sufficient grounds for her separation from service.
  • The implications of her cr...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The court upheld administrative penalties against Milagros Santia for her continuous absence, which was classified as abandonment of her position.
  • The court highlighted the necessity for public employees to fulfill their duties, as their absence can disrupt court operations.
  • Santia's act of falsifying a signature was d...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.