Title
IN RE: Dy vs. Republic
Case
G.R. No. L-20348
Decision Date
Dec 24, 1965
A citizen of Nationalist China, Antonio Dy, files a petition for naturalization in the Philippines, but fails to prove a lucrative income or occupation and his birth in the Philippines, leading to the court ruling in favor of the Republic of the Philippines and dismissing Dy's petition.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-20348)

Facts:

  • Petition for naturalization of Antonio Dy, a citizen of Nationalist China.
  • Republic of the Philippines opposed the naturalization of Dy.
  • Grounds for opposition: failure to prove lucrative income or occupation and birth in the Philippines.
  • Dy claimed to be employed by his father in their family store, receiving a monthly salary of P80.00 while attending university.
  • After graduating, Dy was appointed as the manager of the family business with a salary increase to P250.00.
  • Dy also engaged in private tutoring work and contributed written articles to the Chinese Commercial News.
  • Dy filed his petition for naturalization on May 26, 1961.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court ruled in favor of the Republic of the Philippines.
  • The decision of the lower court was reversed.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  1. The qualifications of an applicant for naturalization should be determined as of the time of filing the petition.
  • Dy claimed to have a regular salary of P250.00 a month as the manager of the family store.
  • However, this salary increase occurred only one month prior to the filing of his petition.
  • Dy's other alleged sources of income, such as private tutoring and fees as a news contributor, were unsteady and irregular.
  • The Court found that Dy did not possess a lucrative income or occupation as required by law.
  1. Dy failed to prove conclusively that he was born in the Philippines.
  • The birth certificate submitted by Dy showed the name Carmen Dy, not Antoni...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.