Case Digest (G.R. No. L-9097)
Facts:
- On May 6, 1952, Dee Sam, a Chinese national, applied for naturalization in the Court of First Instance of Manila.
- The court granted his application on January 27, 1953, pending compliance with legal requirements for a naturalization certificate.
- On February 16, 1955, Dee Sam petitioned to take his oath of allegiance, claiming continuous residence in the Philippines since the court's decision.
- He admitted to a two-week trip to Saigon in 1953 to settle his father's estate, who had died in Paris.
- The Solicitor General opposed his petition, arguing that the trip violated Republic Act No. 530.
- Despite the opposition, the court allowed Dee Sam to take his oath, leading to an appeal by the Republic of the Philippines to the Supreme Court.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Republic of the Philippines, revoking the lower court's order.
- Dee Sam's two-week absence was deemed a vio...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court highlighted the necessity for strict compliance with Republic Act No. 530, which mandates a two-year probationary period for naturalization.
- During this period, applicants must not leave the Philippines, must engage in lawful professions, must not have criminal convictions, and must not commit acts against the nation.
- The Court noted that these provisions ensure applicants demonstrate commitment to the Philip...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-9097)
Facts:
On May 6, 1952, Dee Sam, also known as Samuel Dee, a Chinese national, filed an application for naturalization in the Court of First Instance of Manila. Following the standard legal proceedings, the court granted his application on January 27, 1953, and ordered that a naturalization certificate be issued to him upon compliance with the necessary legal requirements. On February 16, 1955, more than two years after the initial granting of his application, Dee Sam petitioned the court to allow him to take his oath of allegiance as a Filipino citizen. In his petition, he claimed to have "continuously resided in the Philippines since the promulgation of the decision." However, during the hearing, he admitted to having traveled to Saigon in 1953 for two weeks to settle his father's estate, who had passed away in Paris. This admission prompted the Solicitor General to oppose his petition, arguing that his absence violated the stipulations of Republic Act No. 530. Despite this opposition, the court granted Dee Sam's petition, ruling that his brief absence did not contravene the law. The Republic of the Philippines subsequently appealed this decision to the Supreme Court.
Issue:
- Did Dee Sam's trip...