Title
IN RE: De Guzman vs. Vinarao
Case
G.R. No. 117376
Decision Date
Dec 8, 1994
The Supreme Court orders Oscar de Guzman's release, ruling that his drug offense penalty should be reduced and recommending similar relief for other prisoners.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 117376)

Facts:

  • The case In re De Guzman v. Vinarao, G.R. No. 117376, was decided on December 8, 1994.
  • Petitioners included Oscar de Guzman y Enriquez, Chairman Sedfrey A. Ordoñez, Director Emmanuel C. Neri, and the Commission on Human Rights.
  • They filed a petition for habeas corpus against Director Vicente Vinarao of the Bureau of Corrections.
  • Oscar de Guzman was convicted for violating the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972 for the unlawful sale of two sticks of marijuana.
  • The Regional Trial Court sentenced him to life imprisonment and a fine of P20,000, a decision upheld by the Supreme Court in G.R. No. 76742.
  • Republic Act No. 7659, effective December 31, 1993, amended penalties for drug offenses, reducing penalties for less than 250 grams of marijuana to a range of prision correccional (six months and one day to six years).
  • De Guzman had served over ten years since July 1984, prompting petitioners to argue that his continued detention violated his human rights.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted the habeas corpus petition, ordering Oscar de Guzman's immediate release.
  • The Court found that de Guzman was entitled to the reduced penalty under the amended law.
  • The Director of the New Bilibid Prisons was directed to execute the writ of habea...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The ruling was based on the interpretation of Republic Act No. 7659, which reduced penalties for drug offenses involving less than 250 grams of marijuana.
  • De Guzman's conviction inv...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.