Title
IN RE: Ayllon Sr. vs. Sevilla
Case
G.R. No. 79244
Decision Date
Dec 10, 1987
In a probate case, the Supreme Court denies a petition for certiorari but recognizes the petitioner's hereditary rights as the surviving spouse, directing the trial court to determine the respective shares of the petitioner and respondents in the estate of the deceased.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 79244)

Facts:

  • The case "In re Ayllon Sr. v. Sevilla" concerns a petition for the probate of Mateo Ayllon Sr.'s holographic will, initiated by Erlinda S. Ayllon.
  • Respondents include Prima A. Sevilla, Pilar A. Salazar, Merced A. Pabello, Marcos Ayllon, Angeles A. Salameda, and Vicente Ayllon.
  • The petition was filed on November 7, 1977, in the Court of First Instance of Guiuan, Eastern Samar, under Special Proceeding No. 459.
  • Mateo Ayllon Sr.'s will allocated properties to his surviving spouse, Erlinda, and his children from a previous marriage.
  • The respondents opposed the probate, leading to hearings that extended until late 1981.
  • Erlinda reached a verbal settlement with the respondents, believing she would receive half of a house and lot in exchange for waiving claims to other properties.
  • She instructed her lawyer to file a motion to dismiss the case, which the court granted on March 14, 1984.
  • The respondents failed to comply with the verbal agreement, prompting Erlinda to seek revival of the case on March 22, 1984.
  • The trial court initially revived the case on September 7, 1984, but retracted this order on September 10, 1985, citing the amicable settlement and absence of necessary witnesses.
  • Erlinda's motion for reconsideration was denied, and her appeal to the Court of Appeals was dismissed due to her counsel's failure to file a Record on Appeal.
  • Erlinda's motion for reconsideration of the dismissal was also denied, leading her to file a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court denied Erlinda's petition for certiorari, upholding the Court of Appeals' dismissal of her appeal due to her counsel's negligence.
  • The Court recognized Erlinda's hereditary rights as the surviving spouse and remanded the case to the trial court to determine the r...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court justified the dismissal of Erlinda's appeal based on her counsel's significant procedural error in failing to file a Record...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.