Case Digest (G.R. No. 60161)
Facts:
- The case involves a dispute over a residential land in Davao City.
- The Tuyac heirs filed a petition claiming that they should be preferred in the purchase of the land.
- Their predecessor-in-interest, Filomeno Tuyac, had occupied the land earlier than Alfredo Martin.
- The Tuyac heirs argued that they should be given priority under Republic Act No. 477 (RA 477), as amended.
- Filomeno Tuyac entered the land in April 1953.
- Alfredo Martin, a war veteran, occupied the land after December 12, 1946, but before December 31, 1953.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court denies the petition of the Tuyac heirs and upholds the award of...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court ruled that Filomeno Tuyac could not make a valid claim to any precedence in award over the land under Republic Act No. 477 (RA 477), as amended.
- RA 477 provides preferences for the purchase of residential lands, with the first preference given to those who have bona fide occupation on or before December 12, 1946.
- Filomeno Tuyac entered the land in April 1953, which does not fall under the first preference.
- The second preference is given to veterans or members of guerilla organizations who occupied the land after December 12, 1946, but before December 31, 1953.
- Alfredo Martin, being a war veteran, occupied the land within the specified period, making him a second preferred awardee.
- The court emphasized that decisions of administrative agencies and officials shoul...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 60161)
Facts:
The case of Heirs of Tuyac v. Consolacion involves a dispute over a residential land in Davao City. The land is part of the "Mitsui Bussan Kaisha Subdivision" and was awarded to war veteran Alfredo Martin under Republic Act No. 477 (RA 477), as amended. The heirs of Filomeno Tuyac, represented by Quirica Tuyac-Amora, filed a protest against the award, claiming that their predecessor-in-interest had occupied the land before Martin.
Issue:
The main issue in the case is whether the award of the land to Martin was valid under RA 477. The Tuyac heirs argue that their predecessor had occupied the land earlier than Martin and should have been given preference in the award.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court, in its ruling, denies the petition of the Tuyac heirs and upholds the ...