Case Digest (G. R. No. 40062)
Facts:
- In G.R. No. 40062, D. Hamano, the plaintiff and appellant, filed a lawsuit against Demetria D. Estrada and Salvador Estrada, the defendants and appellees.
- The case was initially heard in the Court of First Instance of Manila, which rendered a decision on March 9, 1933.
- The specifics of the events leading to the lawsuit are not detailed, but the case was significant enough to be appealed to the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
- The Supreme Court rendered its decision on July 31, 1934, after reviewing the records and submissions from both parties.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of First Instance of Manila dated March 9, 1933.
- The appeal by D. Hamano was denied. ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court's decision was based on a thorough review of the records and submissions from both parties.
- The Court found no reversible error in the decision of the Court of First Instance of Manila.
- The affirmation indicates that the lower court's judgment was con...continue reading
Case Digest (G. R. No. 40062)
Facts:
In the case of G.R. No. 40062, D. Hamano, the plaintiff and appellant, filed a lawsuit against Demetria D. Estrada and Salvador Estrada, the defendants and appellees. The case was initially heard in the Court of First Instance of Manila, where a decision was rendered on March 9, 1933. The dispute arose from a series of events that led Hamano to seek legal redress against the Estradas. Although the specifics of the events leading to the lawsuit are not detailed in the provided text, it is evident that the case was significant enough to be appealed to the Supreme Court of the Philippines. The Supreme Court, having acquired jurisdiction and after due consideration of the records and submissions from both partie...