Title
Gundran vs. Red Line Transportation Co., Inc.
Case
G.R. No. L-15747
Decision Date
Nov 3, 1961
The Supreme Court rules that jurisdiction in a motorboat accident depends on individual plaintiff claims, remanding the case to the Court of Appeals for further action.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-15747)

Facts:

  • The case is an appeal from the Court of First Instance of Cagayan.
  • The complaint was filed by plaintiffs-appellants against Red Line Transportation Company, Inc.
  • The incident occurred in February 1953 when a motorboat capsized in the Cagayan River, resulting in multiple fatalities.
  • The plaintiffs-appellants are heirs of the deceased individuals seeking damages for their loss.
  • Claims for damages varied, with Victoriano Gundran seeking P21,580.00 and Filemon Esguierra claiming P70,553.00, among others.
  • The total claims included actual, mental, moral, exemplary, and compensatory damages.
  • The lower court ruled in favor of the defendant, prompting the appeal.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs-appellants.
  • The decision of the Court of First Instance of Cagayan was reversed.
  • The Court found that the plaintiffs ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court's decision was based on the principle of liability for negligence.
  • The defendant had a duty to ensure passenger safety as the operator of the motorboat.
  • Evidence indicated that the capsizing resulted from the defendant's failure to exercise necessa...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.