Case Digest (G.R. No. 48160)
Facts:
- Rosario Guevara and Pedro Buyson filed a petition against the Court of Appeals and Ernesto M. Guevara.
- The Court of First Instance of Pangasinan ordered Ernesto M. Guevara to deliver a certain portion of land to Rosario Guevara and Pedro Buyson.
- Both parties appealed the decision.
- Ernesto M. Guevara offered to file an appeal bond during the process of perfecting his appeal.
- The Court of First Instance approved the record on appeal without requiring an appeal bond.
- The petitioners asked the Court of Appeals to dismiss the appeal for failure to file an appeal bond, which the Court of Appeals denied.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court ruled that the new Rules of Court should not be applied in this case.
- Rule 133 of the new Rules of Court states that the rules shall take effect on July 1, 1940, and shall govern all cases brought after that date, as well as all further proceedings in cases then pending.
- However, the court has the discretion to apply the former procedure if it would not be feasible or would work injustice.
- In this case, the court found that applying the new Rules of Court would be unjust because Ernesto M. Guevara had offered t...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court's decision was based on Rule 133 of the new Rules of Court, which allows the court to apply the former procedure if it ...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 48160)
Facts:
The case of Guevara v. Court of Appeals involves the petitioners, Rosario Guevara and Pedro Buyson, and the respondent, Ernesto M. Guevara. The case originated from the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan, where Ernesto Guevara was ordered to deliver a portion of a piece of land to Rosario Guevara and Pedro Buyson in Civil Case No. 7618. Both parties appealed the decision. In his efforts to perfect his appeal, Ernesto Guevara offered to file an appeal bond, stating that he was ready and willing to fulfill the requirement if it was deemed applicable to the case. The Court of First Instance approved the record on appeal without requiring an appeal bond. However, the petitioners asked the Court of Appeals to dismiss the appeal for the failure to file an appeal bond. The Court of Appeals denied the motion.
Issue:
The main issue in this case is whether the old Code of Civil Procedure or the new Rules of Court should be applied. The old Code of ...