Case Digest (G.R. No. 35357)
Facts:
- Rosauro Almario published defamatory articles about Guillermo Guevara, the Fiscal of the City of Manila.
- The articles were published in La Vanguardia, a daily newspaper in Manila, on March 3 and March 16, 1927.
- The articles criticized Guevara as a public official and attacked his personal integrity.
- Almario pleaded guilty in a criminal action and was sentenced to pay a fine of P400.
- Guevara filed a civil case to recover damages amounting to P100,000.
- Almario claimed that the articles were true and had justifiable motives.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The court ruled in favor of Guevara and ordered Almario to pay him P1,000 in damages.
- The other defendants, La Vanguardia Incorporated, Marciano Almari...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court admitted evidence from the previous criminal case where Almario pleaded guilty to the libelous articles.
- However, a judgment of conviction in a criminal proceeding cannot be admitted as evidence in a civil action.
- There was no sufficient reason presented as to why the original witnesses in the criminal case could not be produced in the civil case.
- The fact of Almario's conviction could be proved in the civil action.
- In determining the amount of damages, the court considered:
- Special damages were not proven.
- Nominal damages are not generally recognized under civil law.
- Punitive damages had already been imposed in the criminal action.
- The court awarded Guevara P1,000 as general damages, which arise from legal inferences and need not be pro...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 35357)
Facts:
The case of Guevara v. Almario involves Guillermo B. Guevara, who filed a civil case against Rosauro Almario for publishing defamatory articles in La Vanguardia, a daily newspaper in Manila. These articles attacked Guevara's personal integrity and went beyond legitimate criticism of a public official. Almario pleaded guilty in the criminal case and was sentenced to pay a fine. Guevara then filed a civil case seeking damages amounting to P100,000. The trial court admitted evidence from the criminal case, including the record, exhibits, and judgment, as proof of the libel. The defendants, except Almario, filed a motion to dismiss the case, which was denied. The trial court ruled in favor of Guevara and awarded him P5,000 as general damages and P5,000 as punitive damages. The defendants La Vanguardia Incorporated, Marciano Almario, and Manuel V. Villareal were absolved from the complaint.
Issue:
The main issue raised in the case is whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence from the criminal case without sufficient reason for not producing the original witnesses.
Ruling:
The court found that the trial court erred in admitting evidence from the criminal case without s...