Title
Gorospe vs. Millan
Case
G.R. No. L-2534
Decision Date
Oct 13, 1950
The court dismissed the land ownership lawsuit in Pangasinan due to the plaintiffs' non-appearance, resulting in a final adjudication on the merits.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-2534)

Facts:

  • The case involves a dispute over the ownership of several parcels of land in Pangasinan, Philippines.
  • The plaintiffs, Lino Gorospe and others, entrusted Amadeo Millan with the task of purchasing the land on their behalf in 1913.
  • Amadeo Millan purchased eight parcels of land in the plaintiffs' names and gave them immediate possession.
  • However, Amadeo Millan registered the land in his own name and later in the name of his heirs through fraudulent means.
  • The plaintiffs discovered the fraud and requested that Amadeo Millan or his heirs transfer the land to them, but they failed to do so.
  • As a result, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit seeking the transfer of the land and damages amounting to P1,000.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court ruled in favor of the defendants and confirmed the dismissal of the case.
  • The dismissal due to the plaintiff's failure to appear is considered an adjudication upon the merits, re...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The court based its decision on the current rules and regulations regarding the dismissal of a case due to the plaintiff's failure to appear.
  • The court emphasized that the current regulations explicitly state that such dismissal shall have the effect of an adjudication on the merits, unless otherwise provided by the court.
  • The court cited the commentary of the President of the Tribunal, which explained that the dismissal of a case upon the defendant's motion for the plaintiff's failure to appear ha...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.