Title
Geal vs. Geal
Case
G.R. No. 147632
Decision Date
Apr 29, 2005
The Supreme Court upheld one party's possession of 1,000 square meters of land, ordering the other to vacate, pay compensation, and face penalties for unlawful actions.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 147632)

Facts:

  • The case involves Rey Geal (petitioner) and Emma Geal (respondent), decided by the Supreme Court on April 29, 2005.
  • The dispute concerns Lot No. 94 in Sitio Sta. Rosa, Barangay Bongol, San Vicente, Guimbal, Iloilo, part of Maria E. Garingalao's estate, who died intestate.
  • Maria's heirs included Tomas Geal, Sr. and his sister Paz G. Geal.
  • In 1952, Tomas Geal, Sr., his daughter Emma, and her husband Gonzalo Ceballos took possession of the property.
  • Tomas Geal, Sr. sold the property to the Ceballos spouses, which Paz Geal opposed.
  • Paz filed a complaint for recovery of ownership and possession, but it was dismissed upon her death.
  • On February 15, 1989, Tomas Geal, Jr. filed a forcible entry complaint against the Ceballos spouses, claiming rightful possession of Lot No. 94.
  • The Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC) ruled in favor of the Ceballos spouses, a decision affirmed by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) and the Court of Appeals (CA).
  • The CA ordered Geal, Jr. to vacate a 1,000-square-meter portion of the property.
  • The Ceballos spouses later filed another forcible entry complaint against Geal, Jr. and his relatives, claiming illegal entry into Lot No. 94.
  • The MCTC and RTC ruled in favor of the Ceballos spouses, leading to further appeals and motions for execution pending appeal.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court of Appeals did not err; previous decisions did not bar the spouses Ceballos from claiming possession of the remaining portion of Lot No. 94.
  • The sheriff's execution placing the petitioner in possession of the 7,734-square-meter portion was...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the CA's decision, stating that previous rulings only addressed the 1,000-square-meter portion and did not include the remaining 7,734 square meters.
  • For res j...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.