Title
Ganob vs. Ramas
Case
G.R. No. L-23282
Decision Date
Apr 28, 1969
In the case of Ganob v. Ramas, the court ruled in favor of the respondents, stating that the officials acted within their jurisdiction and committed no error or abuse of discretion in reinstating a cancelled sales application for a land in Kapatagan, Lanao. The petitioners' failure to exhaust the administrative remedy of appealing the decision to the President was deemed fatal to their case.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-23282)

Facts:

  • Petition for certiorari filed by Felipe Ganob and others against Remedios Ramas and others
  • Originated from a cancelled sales application filed by Ireneo Quidato for Lot No. 47, PLS-35, Kapatagan Subdivision located in Kapatagan, Lanao
  • Quidato's application was cancelled in 1935 due to non-payment of the installments
  • Leodegario Ramas inquired with the Bureau of Lands about acquiring Quidato's rights
  • Bureau informed Ramas that Quidato's sales application could be reinstated upon payment of the arrears
  • Ramas executed a deed of transfer of rights with Quidato and paid the total amount due to the Bureau of Lands
  • Director of Lands reinstated Quidato's sales application and approved the transfer of rights
  • Ramas occupied and cultivated the land, but after the war, petitioners entered and took possession of the land

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • Court ruled in favor of the respondents and dismissed the petition for certiorari
  • Officials acted within their jurisdiction and committed no error or abuse of discretion in rendering the decisions or orders
  • Reinstatement of Quidato's cancelled sales application was within the sound discretion of the Director of the Bureau of Lands
  • Approval by the Department Head made it unassailable if all the proceedings were in accordance with the law
  • Petitioners failed to ava...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Reinstatement of a cancelled sales application is within the discretion of the Director of the ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.