Title
Fruto vs. Reyes
Case
G.R. No. 82304
Decision Date
Nov 29, 1989
The court ruled Fruto's dismissal invalid, citing jurisdictional issues and inconsistent decisions, leading to his reinstatement and backwages.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 82304)

Facts:

  • Honorato M. Fruto, the petitioner, filed a case against Rainero O. Reyes and Lina L. Estrada.
  • Fruto was employed as a Chauffeur Examiner in 1950 and rose to the position of Registrar by 1971.
  • On November 1, 1979, he was relieved from his post by Mariano Santiago, Director of the Bureau of Land Transportation (BLT).
  • On May 5, 1980, he was reassigned to a different committee by Jose Villaspin, acting National Capital Regional Director.
  • Fruto filed a complaint with the Merit Systems Board for illegal separation.
  • On July 8, 1981, the Board initially ruled in favor of Fruto, ordering his reinstatement.
  • The BLT filed a motion for reconsideration, leading the Board to reverse its decision and dismiss Fruto's complaint.
  • The case was escalated to the Supreme Court to assess the validity of Fruto's dismissal.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Honorato M. Fruto, declaring his dismissal invalid.
  • The Court ordered Fruto's reinstatement to his former or an equivalent position.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court determined that the Merit Systems Board's decision on July 8, 1981, had become final and could not be reconsidered.
  • The Court found the Board's reversal unjustified and lacking jurisdiction, as the original ruling had established Fruto's right to reinstatement.
  • The Court criticized the Board for its inconsistent decisions, stating it could not absolve Fruto in one ruling and then find him guilty in another based ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.