Title
Fil-Estate Properties, Inc. vs. Spouses Ronquillo
Case
G.R. No. 185798
Decision Date
Jan 13, 2014
Fil-Estate Properties, Inc. and Fil-Estate Network, Inc. must refund the Ronquillo spouses for a failed condominium project, including moral damages, attorney's fees, and an administrative fine.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 185798)

Facts:

  • Petitioners: Fil-Estate Properties, Inc. and Fil-Estate Network, Inc.
  • Respondents: Spouses Conrado and Maria Victoria Ronquillo.
  • Respondents purchased an 82-square meter condominium unit at Central Park Place Tower, Mandaluyong City for P5,174,000.00.
  • On August 29, 1997, they executed a Reservation Application Agreement and paid a reservation fee of P200,000.00.
  • They made a down payment of P1,552,200.00 and monthly amortizations of P63,363.33 until September 1998.
  • Construction ceased, prompting respondents to stop payments after totaling P2,198,949.96.
  • Respondents demanded a full refund with interest through two letters, which went unanswered.
  • Filed a Complaint for Refund and Damages before the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB).
  • HLURB issued an Order of Default against petitioners on October 21, 2000, for failing to respond.
  • Petitioners attributed construction delays to the 1997 Asian financial crisis and denied fraudulent conduct.
  • On June 13, 2002, HLURB Arbiter ruled in favor of respondents, ordering a refund plus interest, moral damages, attorney's fees, and an administrative fine.
  • Petitioners' appeals to the HLURB Board of Commissioners and the Office of the President were unsuccessful.
  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the previous decisions, leading petitioners to file a petition for review with the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the Asian financial crisis did not excuse the petitioners from their contractual obligations.
  • The Court affirmed the lower courts' decisions, ordering a refund of the total amount paid by the respondents, including interest.
  • The Court modified the legal interest to 6% per annum, effective from the date...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court determined that the Asian financial crisis was not a fortuitous event exempting the petitioners from their contractual duties.
  • The failure to develop the condominium project was a substantial breach of contract, allowing respondents to rescind the agreement and seek reimbursement.
  • Cited Article 1191 of the New Civil Code, which permits rescission in reciprocal obligations when one party...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.