Case Digest (A.M. No. MTJ-98-1150)
Facts:
- Judge Lilia C. Español of the Municipal Trial Court in Cities of Dagupan City was accused of gross ignorance of the law and rendering an unjust interlocutory order in an unlawful detainer case.
- The complainant, Oscar C. Fernandez, was the plaintiff in the case and a decision was rendered in his favor, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay rentals, damages, and attorney's fees.
- The defendant filed a notice of appeal, but failed to post a supersedeas bond and pay the monthly rentals.
- The complainant filed a motion for execution as a result.
- The respondent judge initially granted the motion and ordered the issuance of a writ of execution.
- However, the defendant filed a motion for reconsideration, claiming that the complainant's brothers had renewed the lease contract.
- The respondent judge granted the motion for reconsideration and gave due course to the defendant's appeal.
- The complainant alleged that the appellate docket fee was paid by the defendant six months after the 15-day period within which to appeal had expired.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- Yes, the respondent judge committed gross ignorance of the law and rendered an unjust interlocutory ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court found that the respondent judge showed ignorance of the law by not recognizing that the complainant, as ...continue reading
Case Digest (A.M. No. MTJ-98-1150)
Facts:
The case of Fernandez v. Español involves a complaint for unlawful detainer filed by Oscar C. Fernandez against the defendant. A decision was rendered in favor of Fernandez, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay rentals, damages, and attorney's fees. The defendant filed a notice of appeal but failed to post a supersedeas bond and pay the monthly rentals. Fernandez filed a motion for execution, which was set for hearing by respondent judge, Judge Lilia C. Español. At the hearing, Judge Español gave the defendant ten days to submit a memorandum and Fernandez five days to file a reply memorandum. However, the defendant did not file a memorandum within the given period. Fernandez filed a reply memorandum to answer some arguments made by the defendant. Judge Español granted Fernandez's motion for execution on May 15, 1996. However, the defendant filed a motion for reconsideration, claiming that Fernandez's brothers, who are co-owners of the property, had renewed the lease contract. The defendant attached an unsworn "Affidavit" from the alleged co-owners stating that they did not authorize the filing of the complaint and consented to the defendant's continued stay on the property. Fernandez filed a motion to expunge the motion for reconsideration from the record, argui...