Title
Faelnar vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 140850-51
Decision Date
May 4, 2000
The Supreme Court denies petitioner Eugenio Faelnar's attempt to set aside the trial court's orders, ruling that the resolution of the COMELEC dismissing the complaint against him was not immediately final and executory, emphasizing the importance of following correct legal procedures.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 140850-51)

Facts:

  • Eugenio "Jing-Jing" Faelnar filed a certificate of candidacy for Barangay Chairman of Barangay Guadalupe, Cebu City, for the May 12, 1997 elections.
  • A basketball tournament named "2nd JING-JING FAELNAR'S CUP" was organized from April 9 to April 30, 1997.
  • Antonio Luy filed a complaint against Faelnar and Cecilio Gillamac, alleging unlawful campaign activity outside the official campaign period.
  • Luy claimed Faelnar's name was prominently featured during the tournament, including announcements and advertisements, with raffle prizes sponsored by Gillamac.
  • An initial investigation recommended dismissing the charges, but the COMELEC Law Department suggested filing charges.
  • On September 16, 1997, COMELEC issued Resolution No. 97-3040, dismissing the case.
  • Following Luy's motion for reconsideration, COMELEC reversed its decision and ordered charges against Faelnar and Gillamac.
  • Faelnar moved to quash the information, arguing the dismissal resolution was executory and could not be reconsidered.
  • The trial court denied his motion on July 29, 1999, and a subsequent motion for reconsideration was denied on October 4, 1999.
  • Faelnar then filed a petition for certiorari.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court denied Faelnar's petition for certiorari, affirming the trial court's orders that denied his motion to quash the informations.
  • The Court held that COMELEC's Resolution No. 98-2914, directing the filing of charges against Faelnar, was valid and binding.
  • Faelnar failed to seek annulment of the resolution within the prescri...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of following legal procedures and the finality of COMELEC resolutions.
  • The Court clarified that the dismissal resolution was not immediately fi...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.