Facts:

• The case G.R. No. 35273 was decided on April 5, 1932.
• It involves the Estate of Celestino Guzman and the contestation of his will's validity.
• The respondents are the heirs of Celestino Guzman, who sought probate for the will.
• The lower court denied the will's probate due to an insufficient attestation clause.
• Although the will was executed in the presence of witnesses, the court found the attestation clause unclear.
• The heirs appealed the decision, arguing for the will's admission to probate despite the alleged deficiencies.

Issue:

• (Unlock)

Ruling:

• The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision.
• The Court ordered the probate of Celestino Guzman's will, ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

• The ruling was based on the interpretation of the Civil Code's requirements for valid wills.
• The Court noted that while an attestation clause is important, its absence does not automatically invalidate a will if the testator's intent is clear.
• The will was duly signed by the testator and witnessed by the required number of witnesses, fulfilling essential elements of validity.
• The Court emphasized that the la...continue reading