Case Digest (G.R. No. 36219)
Facts:
- Petition for certiorari filed by Maria Elviña against Judge Enrique V. Filamor of the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija and Potenciana C. Domingo.
- Petitioner seeks to set aside several orders issued by the respondent judge, including the order vacating a previous decision that declared Potenciana C. Domingo in default and adjudicated lots Nos. 1 and 2 of registration proceeding No. 1970 to the petitioner.
- The land in question had already been litigated in a civil case and another registration proceeding, both of which were decided in favor of Potenciana C. Domingo.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The respondent judge had jurisdiction to set aside the previous decision and order of default.
- The decision and order of default can be set aside even after thirty days from its promulgation if a motion is filed within six months from the date of the decision and before the issuance of the decree of registration.
- In this case, the motions to set aside the decision were filed within the ...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court based its ruling on Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which allows for the setting aside of a decision and order of default in a registration proceeding if a motion is filed within six months from the date of the decision and before the issuance of the decree of registration.
- The court cons...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 36219)
Facts:
This case involves a petition for certiorari filed by Maria Elviña against Judge Enrique V. Filamor of the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija and Potenciana C. Domingo. The petitioner seeks to set aside several orders issued by the respondent judge, including the order vacating a previous decision and order of default in a land dispute case. The land in question had already been litigated between the petitioner and the respondent in a civil case and another registration proceeding. The petitioner filed an application for the registration of the land, and after no opposition was raised, the court entered an order of general default and rendered a decision in favor of the petitioner. However, the respondent filed a motion to set aside the decision, claiming that she had not been given notice of the registration case. The motion was denied, but the respondent filed subsequent motions requesting reconsideration and alleging ownership and possession of the land. The respondent judge e...