Facts:

• The case involves Dupaya and Siriban vs. Caulan, Vda. de Dupaya, G.R. No. 34547, decided on April 5, 1932.
• The dispute centers on the ownership of a parcel of land.
• Plaintiffs Dupaya and Siriban claimed ownership based on a deed of sale.
• Defendant Vda. de Dupaya argued that the deed was invalid and asserted her rightful ownership due to long-term possession.
• The lower court initially ruled in favor of the plaintiffs after they presented their evidence, including the deed of sale.
• The defendant countered with evidence of her possession and circumstances surrounding the deed's execution.
• The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals after the lower court's ruling.

Issue:

• (Unlock)

Ruling:

• The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's judgment, ruling in favor of the defendant, Vda. de Dupaya.
• The Court determined that the plaintiffs' evi...(Unlock)

Ratio:

• The Supreme Court's decision was based on the inadequacy of the plaintiffs' evidence to establish ownership.
• The Court stressed that ownership must be proven with clear and convincing evidence, which the plaintiffs did not provide.
• The deed of sale, while important, did not outweigh the defendant's established possession of the property.
• The Court recognized possession as a strong indicator of ownership, with the...continue reading