Case Digest (G. R. No. 38836)
Facts:
- The case involves Domingo Cansino and others (applicants and appellees) against Leonarda Guzman and others (oppositors and appellants).
- The dispute was initially heard in the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan.
- The lower court issued an order on September 30, 1932, which was subsequently appealed by the oppositors.
- The case was then brought before the Supreme Court of the Philippines for resolution.
- Specific details of the events leading to the dispute, including the nature of the conflict between the parties, are not provided in the decision summary.
- The appellants were dissatisfied with the lower court's ruling and sought a reversal or modification of the decision.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the order of the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan dated September 30, 1932.
- The decision was rendered on May 25, 1934.
- The appellan...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court, after reviewing the records and considering the arguments presented by both parties, found no error in the decision of the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan.
- The affirmation of the lower court's order indicates that the Supreme Court agreed with the findings and conclusions of the trial court.
- The legal basis for the decision, while not explicitly detailed in the summary, would have been grounded in the applicable laws ...continue reading
Case Digest (G. R. No. 38836)
Facts:
The case involves Domingo Cansino and others (applicants and appellees) against Leonarda Guzman and others (oppositors and appellants). The dispute was initially heard in the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan. The lower court issued an order on September 30, 1932, which was subsequently appealed by the oppositors. The case was then brought before the Supreme Court of the Philippines for resolution. The specific details of the events leading to the dispute, including the nature of the conflict between the parties, are not provided in the decision summary. However, it is clear that the appellants were dissatisfied with the lower court's ruling and sought a reversal or modification of the decision.
Issue:
- Did the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan err in its order dat...