Title
Domestic Insurance Company of the Philippines vs. Barber Line
Case
G.R. No. L-23879
Decision Date
Nov 18, 1967
The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the Domestic Insurance Company's suit against the Republic of the Philippines, affirming the government's immunity from litigation without consent.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-23879)

Facts:

  • The case involves the Domestic Insurance Company of the Philippines (plaintiff-appellant) against Barber Line, Macondray & Co., Inc., and/or the Republic of the Philippines (defendants-appellees).
  • On May 17, 1963, the SS Queensville loaded cargo in New York, U.S.A., destined for Centennial Commercial Corporation in Manila.
  • Among the cargo were three cartons of shears, for which Barber Line issued a Bill of Lading.
  • The vessel arrived in Manila on June 24, 1963, and discharged its cargo into the custody of the arrastre operator under the Bureau of Customs.
  • Centennial Commercial Corporation completed all necessary shipping documents through the defendants and the Bureau of Customs.
  • Due to alleged negligence by the defendants, certain items were not delivered, resulting in a loss of P8,800.92.
  • The Domestic Insurance Company, as the insurer-subrogee, filed a suit for money against the defendants to recover the losses.
  • The Republic of the Philippines was named as an alternative defendant.
  • The lower court dismissed the case against the Republic, citing state immunity from suit without consent.
  • The Domestic Insurance Company appealed the dismissal.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the case against the Republic of the Philippines, ruling that the stat...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court reiterated established jurisprudence on state immunity from suit, especially regarding functions related to revenue assessment and collection, tariffs, and customs duties.
  • The operation of the arrastre service by the ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.