Title
Delos Santos vs. Commission on Audit
Case
G.R. No. 198457
Decision Date
Aug 13, 2013
The case of Delos Santos v. Commission on Audit involves the disallowance of funds for anti-rabies drugs due to falsified prescription and documents, with the Court holding the petitioners solidarily liable for the irregular disbursements.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 198457)

Facts:

  • Petitioners: Filomena G. Delos Santos, Josefa A. Bacaltos, Nelanie A. Antoni, and Maureen A. Bien.
  • Respondent: Commission on Audit (CoA).
  • Dispute: Disallowance of P3,386,697.10 for anti-rabies drugs under the Tony N' Tommy (TNT) Health Program.
  • Funding: Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) of Congressman Antonio V. Cuenco, Second District of Cebu City.
  • Allocation: Funds appropriated to Vicente Sotto Memorial Medical Center (VSMMC) via a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) in October 2001.
  • Allegations: Forgery and falsification of prescriptions and documents for the TNT Program.
  • Investigation: Conducted by Delos Santos, the Medical Center Chief, followed by a CoA audit.
  • Findings: Multiple irregularities, including falsified prescriptions and fictitious patients.
  • Notice of Disallowance: ND No. 2008-09-01 issued on September 8, 2008.
  • CoA Decision: Petitioners held solidarily liable for the disallowed amount.
  • Appeals: CoA affirmed the disallowance in Decision Nos. 2010-051 and 2011-045.
  • Legal Action: Petitioners filed a petition for certiorari under Rule 64 in relation to Rule 65 of the Rules of Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the petition.
  • Upheld CoA's decisions holding petitioners solidarily liable for the disallowed amount.
  • Referred the case to the Office of the Ombudsman for investigation and possi...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • No grave abuse of discretion by CoA in issuing the decisions.
  • CoA's findings based on substantial evidence, including VSMMC officials' failure to adhere to auditing laws, rules, and regulations.
  • Emphasis on public officers' liability for ensuring government funds are expended lawfully.
  • Petitioners' neglect facilitated validation and payment of 133 falsified prescriptions and fictitious claims.
  • Good faith defense not applicable due to violat...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.