Title
De Villanueva vs. Philippine National Bank
Case
G.R. No. L-18403
Decision Date
Sep 30, 1963
In the case of De Villanueva v. Philippine National Bank, the court denies the creditor's claim of the bank against the estate, ruling that it was filed outside of the specified period and lacked justifiable reason for an extension.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-18403)

Facts:

  • Mauricia G. de Villanueva filed for letters of administration for her deceased husband Pascual Villanueva's estate on December 19, 1949, in the Court of First Instance of Agusan.
  • The hearing notice was published in the Manila Daily Bulletin on February 25, March 4, and March 11, 1950.
  • Due to opposition from other heirs, Atty. Teodulo R. Ricaforte was appointed as the administrator instead of Mauricia.
  • A notice to creditors was published on November 16, 23, and 30, 1950, with a claim deadline set for November 16, 1951.
  • The Philippine National Bank (PNB) submitted a claim of P1,347.45 on July 20, 1953.
  • The administrator opposed PNB's claim, citing late filing and the statute of limitations.
  • PNB later requested an extension to file its claim, claiming ignorance of the proceedings, but the lower court denied this request.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that PNB's claim was barred by the statute of limitations.
  • The court upheld the lower court's decision, confirming that the claim was filed after the November 16, 1951 deadline....(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Courts may extend the filing period for claims against an estate only under special circumstances.
  • PNB's claim was filed approximately one year and eight months late, despite the bank's prior knowledge of the administration proceedings.
  • ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.