Title
De Luz vs. Court of 1st Instance of Tacloban, Leyte
Case
G.R. No. L-600
Decision Date
Nov 29, 1946
A divorce decision was annulled and the complaint dismissed due to procedural errors under Executive Order No. 141.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-600)

Facts:

  • Soledad Pena de Luz (petitioner) and Simeon D. Luz (respondent) were married on September 26, 1940, in Manila.
  • They had a son, Cesar, born on July 11, 1941.
  • Simeon claimed Soledad abandoned him on July 20, 1941, by going to her mother's home in Sinait, Ilocos Sur.
  • Simeon filed for divorce on September 22, 1943, under Executive Order No. 141 during the Japanese occupation.
  • Soledad was served with summons on January 20, 1944, at her mother's residence.
  • She filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on January 31, 1944, citing lack of jurisdiction, which was denied on April 1, 1944.
  • Soledad's answer to the complaint was delayed in transit and received by the court on June 23, 1944.
  • On October 23, 1945, Soledad's attorney filed a motion to set aside the default decision from March 24, 1944, which was denied, leading to the annulment petition.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the decision of the Court of First Instance of Leyte on March 24, 1944, was null and void due to the lack of opportunity for Soledad Pena de Luz to presen...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court determined that the lower court acted prematurely by declaring Soledad in default while her motion to dismiss was pending.
  • The return of service of summons was received only three days before the default order was issued, indicating a lack of due process.
  • Soledad had the right to respond within the prescribed period, and...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.