Title
De Leon vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 56968
Decision Date
Apr 30, 1984
The Supreme Court dismisses the petition to disqualify a municipal mayor due to insufficient evidence and mootness, with no procedural due process violations.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 56968)

Facts:

  • Rodolfo de Leon is the petitioner; Commission on Elections (COMELEC) and Conrado Lindo are the respondents.
  • The case arose from the municipal elections on January 30, 1980, in Ternate, Cavite.
  • De Leon, a KBL candidate, was proclaimed the duly-elected mayor.
  • Lindo, also from KBL but running as an independent, faced a disqualification petition from de Leon on January 25, 1980.
  • The disqualification was based on Lindo's alleged failure to meet the six-month residency requirement, claiming he was a resident of Noveleta, Cavite.
  • De Leon submitted a supplemental letter on January 28, 1980, including a certification from the barangay captain asserting Lindo's residency since 1969.
  • Despite the pending petition, elections proceeded, and de Leon was proclaimed mayor.
  • On February 28, 1980, COMELEC denied de Leon's petition, citing insufficient evidence against Lindo.
  • De Leon's motion for reconsideration was also denied, with COMELEC stating the issue was moot since de Leon had assumed office.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court upheld COMELEC's decision, affirming the dismissal of the disqualification petition.
  • The Court found no violation of procedural due process in the proceedings before COMELEC.
  • The Court concluded that the ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court reasoned that the dismissal of the disqualification petition aligned with established legal principles regarding pre-proclamation controversies.
  • De Leon's pursuit of disqualification after his election and assumption of office was deemed unwarranted, as he had other remedies available, such as a protest or quo warranto.
  • The Court noted that de Leon failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims against Lindo, and the certifications submitted were inadequate to prove Lindo's alleged lack of residency.
  • De Leon did not request a formal hearing to pre...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.