Title
Collector of Internal Revenue vs. Eternit Corp.
Case
G.R. No. L-11891
Decision Date
Apr 29, 1959
The Supreme Court rules that asbestos installation costs are taxable, despite Eternit Corporation's exemption for manufacturing and selling such products.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-11891)

Facts:

  • The case "Collector of Internal Revenue v. Eternit Corporation" was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on April 29, 1959.
  • The petitioner, Collector of Internal Revenue, challenged the tax obligations of Eternit Corporation, a manufacturer of asbestos cement products.
  • Eternit Corporation was granted a tax exemption under Republic Act Nos. 35 and 901, recognized as an essential industry.
  • The Secretary of Finance extended the tax exemption until December 31, 1958.
  • A dispute arose when a 3% contractor's tax was imposed on Eternit Corporation's gross receipts of P1,021,600.44 from January 1951 to June 1955.
  • These gross receipts included sales of asbestos products, accessories, labor, and delivery charges.
  • Eternit Corporation contested the tax assessment in the Court of Tax Appeals, asserting that their gross receipts were exempt from taxation.
  • The Court of Tax Appeals ruled that while sales of asbestos products were exempt, the contractor's tax applied to the labor component, totaling P149,044.63, leading to a tax assessment of P5,639.17.
  • Both parties appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court upheld the ruling of the Court of Tax Appeals.
  • Eternit Corporation is not exempt from the contractor's tax concerning the installation costs of asbestos sheets.
  • Payments for installation services are subject to contr...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court interpreted the tax exemption statutes, noting that the legislation does not explicitly include installation services.
  • Following the principle of strict construction, the exemption could not be extended to ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.