Case Digest (G.R. No. 12623)
Facts:
- Petitioners Chan Lin and Lee Lion were convicted by the municipal court of Manila for participating in a gambling game.
- They were arrested and charged under the Gambling Law, specifically Act No. 1757.
- The petitioners appealed to the Court of First Instance of Manila, filing a demurrer to challenge the municipal court's jurisdiction.
- They argued that the municipal court lacked jurisdiction because the Gambling Law allowed for penalties exceeding six months of imprisonment and a fine of P200.
- The Court of First Instance overruled the demurrer, conducted a trial, and convicted the petitioners, imposing a fine of P100 each.
- The petitioners appealed to the Supreme Court, asserting that the municipal court had no jurisdiction, which rendered all proceedings ineffective.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court ruled that the municipal court of Manila had jurisdiction over the gambling offense charged against the petitioners.
- Consequently, the Court of First Instance had the authority to hear the appe...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court's decision was based on the interpretation of jurisdictional statutes in effect at the time.
- The petitioners claimed that the municipal court's jurisdiction was limited by the Act of Congress of July 1, 1902.
- The Court clarified that the municipal court was operating under the jurisdiction granted by Act No. 267, which provided it with concurrent jurisdiction with the Court of First Instance over violations o...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 12623)
Facts:
The case involves petitioners Chan Lin and Lee Lion, who were convicted by the municipal court of the city of Manila for engaging in a gambling game within the police jurisdiction of the city. The events leading to the conviction occurred when the petitioners were arrested and subsequently charged under the Gambling Law, specifically Act No. 1757. Following their conviction, they appealed to the Court of First Instance of Manila, where they filed a demurrer challenging the jurisdiction of the municipal court. The basis of their argument was that the municipal court lacked jurisdiction over the crime since the Gambling Law allowed for penalties exceeding six months of imprisonment and a fine of P200, which they claimed was beyond the municipal court's authority. The Court of First Instance overruled the demurrer, proceeded with the trial, and ultimately convicted the petitioners, imposing a fine of P100 each. The petitioners then sought further recourse by appealing to the Supreme Court, which was denied by the Court of First Instance. The core of the petition to the Supreme Court was the assertion that the municipal court had no jurisdiction over the c...