Case Digest (G.R. No. 11754)
Facts:
- Aquilino Calvo, Sheriff of Pangasinan, is the plaintiff and appellee.
- Co Cang & Co. and other defendants are the appellants.
- The case was decided on October 8, 1917.
- The dispute involves proceeds from a sale under executions against Lim Kian and Lim Tiang Teng's property.
- The property was sold to Simon Jangaon, representing Co Cang & Co., for P685, with costs of P207.05.
- This left a balance of P477.95, contested by various defendants claiming entitlement.
- Co Cang & Co. had a judgment against Lim Kian and Lim Tiang Teng for P878.08 for goods sold.
- Other defendants claimed preference based on prior judgments against Lim Kian and Lim Tiang Teng, citing Article 1924 of the Civil Code.
- The lower court ruled in favor of defendants So Yengco, Jose S. Yok Peng, and Doroteo Soratos, ordering proceeds to be divided without considering costs.
- Co Cang & Co. appealed, arguing the court erred in determining preference based solely on judgment dates.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Co Cang & Co., revoking the lower court's judgment.
- It ordered a judgment in favor of Co Cang...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Civil Code, particularly Articles 1922 and 1924.
- The Court emphasized that the right of preference should not depend solely on the chronological order of judgments.
- Article 1922 states that credits for the sale of personal property in the debtor's possession a...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 11754)
Facts:
The case involves Aquilino Calvo, the Sheriff of Pangasinan, as the plaintiff and appellee against Co Cang & Co. and other defendants, who are the appellants. The case was decided on October 8, 1917. The dispute arose from the proceeds of a sale conducted under several executions against the property of Lim Kian and Lim Tiang Teng. The property was sold to Simon Jangaon, a representative of Co Cang & Co., for P685, with incurred costs amounting to P207.05. This left a balance of P477.95, which became the subject of contention among the various defendants who claimed entitlement to the proceeds.
Co Cang & Co. asserted that they had a judgment against Lim Kian and Lim Tiang Teng for P878.08, which represented the price of goods sold to them. Other defendants, including So Yengco, Doroteo Soratos, and several others, admitted the facts but contended that they had obtained judgments against Lim Kian and Lim Tiang Teng prior to Co Cang & Co.'s attachment, thus claiming a preference based on Article 1924 of the Civil Code. The lower court, presided over by Hon. Julio Llorente, ruled in favor of the defendants So Yengco, Jose ...