Title
Calvero vs. Employees' Compensation Commission
Case
G.R. No. 52059
Decision Date
Sep 30, 1982
A teacher's multiple sclerosis, developed during employment, was ruled compensable as her work conditions increased risk; GSIS ordered to pay benefits.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 52059)

Facts:

  1. Employment Background:

    • Bonifacia M. Calvero began her government service on July 28, 1941, as a temporary teacher in Dagupan. She was later given a permanent appointment on July 1, 1947, and was promoted to various positions, including elementary school principal and eventually district supervisor. Her duties were primarily administrative and supervisory.
  2. Medical History:

    • On June 12, 1971, Calvero first experienced symptoms of her ailment, described as "hotness and heaviness in the sole of her feet," after participating in the Independence Day Parade. These symptoms persisted intermittently until March 14, 1974, when she reported difficulty in locomotion, stiffness, numbness, tingling, and continuous hot sensations from her soles to her waist. She was treated by multiple physicians, and her condition was eventually diagnosed as multiple sclerosis by a neurologist, Dr. Luz Pulmano Mabanag.
  3. Retirement and Claim:

    • Due to her deteriorating health, Calvero retired on November 1, 1977, at the age of 55. She filed a claim for disability benefits under Presidential Decree No. 626, as amended, with the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) in January 1978. The GSIS denied her claim, stating that multiple sclerosis is not an occupational disease and that there was no evidence linking her condition to her employment.
  4. Appeal to ECC:

    • Calvero appealed to the Employees' Compensation Commission (ECC), which affirmed the GSIS decision. The ECC ruled that her ailment was not listed as an occupational disease and that there was no substantial evidence showing that her employment increased the risk of contracting multiple sclerosis.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • (Unlock)

Ratio:

  1. Presumption of Compensability:

    • Under the Workmen's Compensation Act, if an ailment supervenes during employment, it is presumed to be compensable unless the employer provides substantial evidence to the contrary. In this case, no such evidence was presented, making the presumption conclusive.
  2. Nature of Employment and Risk Factors:

    • The Court recognized that Calvero's work as a teacher and district supervisor exposed her to physical and environmental stressors that could have contributed to the development or aggravation of her ailment. Even if the exact cause of multiple sclerosis is unknown, the employment conditions increased the risk of contracting or worsening the disease.
  3. Applicability of the Workmen's Compensation Act:

    • Since the cause of action accrued before the New Labor Code took effect, the more favorable provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act apply. The ten-year prescriptive period under the Act was also upheld.
  4. Social Justice and Labor Protection:

    • The Court emphasized the importance of social justice in labor cases, ruling that doubts in the interpretation of labor laws should be resolved in favor of the worker. The decision reflects the Court's commitment to protecting employees' rights, especially in cases involving occupational diseases and disabilities.

Conclusion:

The Supreme Court set aside the decision of the Employees' Compensation Commission and ordered the GSIS to pay Calvero disability compensation benefits, reimburse her medical expenses, and provide rehabilitation services. The GSIS was also granted the right to seek reimbursement from the employer after due process. The ruling reaffirmed the presumption of compensability under the Workmen's Compensation Act and highlighted the Court's commitment to social justice in labor disputes.


Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.