Title
Calimbas vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. L-69932
Decision Date
Oct 8, 1985
The Supreme Court affirms Calimbas as Morong, Bataan's rightful mayor, ruling that the COMELEC's excess vote determination was based on flawed assumptions.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-69932)

Facts:

  • Antonio S. Calimbas is the petitioner against the Hon. Commission on Elections (COMELEC) and Armando M. Quimlat.
  • The case arose from the local elections on January 30, 1980, in Morong, Bataan, where three candidates vied for the Municipal Mayor position: Calimbas (KBL), Quimlat (NP), and Benjamin Escolango (NUL).
  • On January 31, 1980, the Municipal Board of Canvassers proclaimed Calimbas as the elected mayor with 2,545 votes, surpassing Quimlat's 2,103 votes by 442 votes.
  • Quimlat filed an election protest on February 7, 1980, alleging fraud and discrepancies in Voting Center No. 1, claiming 299 voters cast votes while 644 were counted.
  • Calimbas denied the allegations and filed a counter-protest regarding other voting centers.
  • On March 17, 1982, the trial court ruled in favor of Calimbas, confirming his election with a plurality of 113 votes over Quimlat.
  • Quimlat appealed to the COMELEC, which reversed the trial court's decision on January 15, 1985, declaring Quimlat the winner with 1,762 votes against Calimbas's 1,719 votes.
  • Calimbas's motion for reconsideration was denied, leading him to file a petition for certiorari on February 18, 1985.
  • The Supreme Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order on February 21, 1985, preventing Quimlat from assuming office.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Antonio S. Calimbas.
  • The Court set aside the COMELEC's decision dated January 15, 1985, and reinstated the trial court's ruling declaring Calimbas as the duly elected Municipal Mayor of...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court determined that the COMELEC gravely abused its discretion in declaring excess votes in Voting Center No. 1.
  • The Court emphasized that the assessment of excess votes must rely on accurate data regarding registered voters, actual voters, and the number of ballots in the ballot box.
  • The COMELEC's assumption that "registered voters" equated to "actual voters" wa...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.