Title
Cabigting vs. San Miguel Foods, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 167706
Decision Date
Nov 5, 2009
Reynaldo Cabigting, an inventory controller, was illegally dismissed by San Miguel Foods, Inc., but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cabigting, ordering his immediate reinstatement to his previous position without loss of seniority rights.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 167706)

Facts:

  • Reynaldo G. Cabigting worked as an inventory controller at San Miguel Corporation's Feeds and Livestock Division (B-Meg) since February 16, 1984.
  • On June 26, 2000, he received a termination letter from President Arnaldo Africa, stating his position as a sales office coordinator was redundant, effective July 31, 2000.
  • Cabigting was surprised by the termination as he was not a sales office coordinator.
  • He declined an early retirement package offered by the company.
  • At the time of his dismissal, Cabigting was an active union officer.
  • Supported by his union, Cabigting filed a complaint against San Miguel Foods, Inc., claiming his dismissal was illegal due to the mischaracterization of his position.
  • The Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of Cabigting, declaring his dismissal illegal and ordering backwages and separation pay.
  • The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) partially upheld this decision, ordering reinstatement.
  • The Court of Appeals reversed the reinstatement order, citing strained relations, prompting Cabigting to file a petition for review with the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Reynaldo G. Cabigting, affirming the finding of illegal dismissal.
  • The Court ordered his immediate reinstatement to his previous position without loss of seniority rights.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that under Article 279 of the Labor Code, an unjustly dismissed employee is entitled to reinstatement unless clear evidence shows that reinstatement would worsen strained relations.
  • The Court noted that both the Labor Arbiter and the Court of Appeals lacked substantial evidence to support claims of strained relations.
  • It highlighted that hostility from litigation is common and...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.