Title
Bunyi vs. Caraos
Case
A.M. No. MTJ-00-1307
Decision Date
Sep 6, 2000
Judge Felix A. Caraos is penalized for inefficiency due to his non-appearance at a trial and biased remarks regarding the relocation of market vendors.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.M. No. MTJ-00-1307)

Facts:

  • A complaint was filed on February 17, 1997, against Judge Felix A. Caraos of the Municipal Trial Court of Candelaria, Quezon.
  • Complainants included members of the Sangguniang Bayan of Candelaria: Manuel Buny, Anatalia Atienza, Alfredo Laygo, Isidro de Gala, Reynaldo Marquez, Nestor Baera, and Olimpio Bukid.
  • In 1996, the Sangguniang Bayan decided to demolish the old public market to build a new one and designated a temporary market site one kilometer away.
  • A resolution was passed to prohibit vendors from operating in the PNR compound, which was not the designated site.
  • Over 300 vendors began operating in the PNR compound without a Mayor's permit, leading to a decline in municipal income.
  • Attempts by the Mayor and Provincial Governor to relocate the vendors were unsuccessful, resulting in police action and criminal cases filed against the vendors in June 1996.
  • The initial arraignment was set for December 10, 1996, with trial scheduled for January 28, 1997, but Judge Caraos did not appear on the trial date.
  • Complainants alleged that Judge Caraos prejudged the case by criticizing the Mayor's decision.
  • Judge Caraos claimed the complaint was harassment and attributed delays to political conflicts and the complainants' lawyers.
  • The Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) found the cases had been pending for over a year, constituting inefficiency.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • Judge Felix A. Caraos was found guilty of inefficiency and fined P5,000.00.
  • While Judge Caraos's comments were deemed innocent, they were inappro...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the requirement for judges to dispose of cases promptly, as per Rule 3.05 of Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
  • The court noted that the criminal cases filed in June 1996 were not set for arraignment until December 1996, with further delays due to the judge's absence....continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.